The Role of Moral Judgment and Corporate Social Responsibility in Shaping Investment Decisions

Penulis

  • Della Ayu Ningtias Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa
  • Risal Rinofah Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55587/jseb.v1i2.447

Kata Kunci:

Corporate social responsibility; expected dividend; investment decision; moral decision making; socially responsible investment

Abstrak

Purpose: This study examines whether corporate social responsibility (CSR) information and investors’ moral decision-making considerations influence investment decisions in an experimental asset market. It also tests whether expected dividend changes the CSR–investment relationship.

Methods: Participants evaluate six fictitious companies—three with strong and three with weak CSR records—using 30 seven-point items representing Multiple Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT), the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), and the Issue-Contingent Model (ICM). They subsequently trade the companies’ shares across three sessions in which expected dividend is experimentally varied. Investment behavior is captured by bid–ask decisions and analyzed using OLS models with a CSR × expected-dividend interaction.

Novelty: The study integrates rational utility, social-norm, and moral-intensity explanations in one market-based design while separating CSR information from financial payoff signals.

Findings: Based on 67 valid participants and 277 recorded transactions, CSR positively affected investment behavior (β = 3.387, p < 0.001), and its interaction with expected dividend was also positive (β = 0.597, p = 0.001). Expected dividend alone was not significant. MAUT showed a positive effect at the 10% level (β = 0.605, p = 0.075), while ICM was positive at the 5% level (β = 0.665, p = 0.043). The CSR model explained 87.9% of the variance, whereas the moral-model equation explained 18.5%. TPB results were not reported in the available statistical chapter.

Unduhan

Data unduhan tidak tersedia.

Referensi

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195

Alda, M. (2021). The environmental, social, and governance (ESG) dimension of firms in which socially responsible investment and conventional pension funds invest: The mainstream SRI and the ESG inclusion. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298, 126812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126812

Bauer, R., Ruof, T., & Smeets, P. (2021). Get real! Individuals prefer more sustainable investments. The Review of Financial Studies, 34(8), 3976–4043. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhab037

Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G

Chen, S., Han, X., Zhang, Z., & Zhao, X. (2023). ESG investment in China: Doing well by doing good. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 77, 101907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101907

D’Hondt, C., Merli, M., & Roger, T. (2022). What drives retail portfolio exposure to ESG factors? Finance Research Letters, 46, 102470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102470

Fleischman, G. M., Valentine, S. R., Curtis, M. B., & Mohapatra, P. S. (2023). The influence of ethical beliefs and attitudes, norms, and prior outcomes on cybersecurity investment decisions. Business & Society, 62(3), 580–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503221110156

Garg, A., Goel, P., Sharma, A., & Rana, N. P. (2022). As you sow, so shall you reap: Assessing drivers of socially responsible investment attitude and intention. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184, 122030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122030

Giglio, S., Maggiori, M., Stroebel, J., Tan, Z., Utkus, S. P., & Xu, X. (2025). Four facts about ESG beliefs and investor portfolios. Journal of Financial Economics, 164, 103984.

Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889

Hartzmark, S. M., & Sussman, A. B. (2019). Do investors value sustainability? A natural experiment examining ranking and fund flows. The Journal of Finance, 74(6), 2789–2837. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12841

Hofmann, E., Hoelzl, E., & Kirchler, E. (2008). A comparison of models describing the impact of moral decision making on investment decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9577-7

Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278958

Lestari, J. S., & Frömmel, M. (2024). Socially responsible investments: Doing good while doing well in developed versus emerging markets? Research in International Business and Finance, 69, 102229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102229

Mehta, P., Singh, M., Mittal, M., & Singla, H. (2022). Is knowledge alone enough for socially responsible investing? A moderation of religiosity and serial mediation analysis. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 14(3), 413–432.

Meunier, L., & Ohadi, S. (2022). Misconceptions about socially responsible investments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 373, 133868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133868

Pasquino, M., & Lucarelli, C. (2025). Socially responsible investments inside out: A new conceptual framework for investigating retail investor preferences. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 43(3), 449–478.

Pedersen, L. H., Fitzgibbons, S., & Pomorski, L. (2021). Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 572–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001

Raghunandan, A., & Rajgopal, S. (2022). Do ESG funds make stakeholder-friendly investments? Review of Accounting Studies, 27(3), 822–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09693-1

Reber, B., Gold, A., & Gold, S. (2022). ESG disclosure and idiosyncratic risk in initial public offerings. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(3), 867–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04847-8

Riedl, A., & Smeets, P. (2017). Why do investors hold socially responsible mutual funds? The Journal of Finance, 72(6), 2505–2550. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12547

Roos, J. M., Jansson, M., & Gärling, T. (2024). A three-level analysis of values related to socially responsible retirement investments. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 14(2), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2077291

Thanki, H., Shah, S., Oza, A. D., & Kunjadia, M. J. (2022). Individual investors’ intentions toward socially responsible investment. Sustainability, 14(18), 11377. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811377

Yee, C. H., Al-Mulali, U., & Ling, G. M. (2022). Intention towards renewable energy investments in Malaysia: Extending theory of planned behaviour. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(1), 1021–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15737-x

Zhang, X., & Huang, C.-H. (2024). Investor characteristics, intention toward socially responsible investment (SRI), and SRI behavior in the Chinese stock market: The moderating role of risk propensity. Heliyon, 10(14), e34230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34230

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2026-06-01

Terbitan

Bagian

##section.default.title##

Cara Mengutip

The Role of Moral Judgment and Corporate Social Responsibility in Shaping Investment Decisions. (2026). Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Bisnis, 1(2), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.55587/jseb.v1i2.447

Artikel Serupa

Anda juga bisa Mulai pencarian similarity tingkat lanjut untuk artikel ini.

Artikel paling banyak dibaca berdasarkan penulis yang sama